Writ petition sought directions to EPFO to collect provident fund deposits and penalties from employers for specific months. Respondent undertook to examine the complaint, give personal hearing, and pass a speaking order within six weeks; petition disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~93
DINESH RANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Guru, Adv.
versus
EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar Dubey, Adv. for EPFO.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
CM APPL. 57108/2025 (exemption)
W.P.(C) 13954/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:07:22
3 herein.
AMIT SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 /sds/dj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:07:22
1 issue framed by the court
Whether EPFO should be directed to collect provident fund dues with penalties and interest from respondents for specified months.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DINESH RANA
EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
AMIT SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
