Sajjan Mani Tripathi & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC2 Apr 2025W.P.(C)/4124/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; W.P.(C) 4124/2025; Sajjan Mani Tripathi v. Union of India; Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju (oral); decided 02.04.2025; Section 29 Industrial Disputes Act 1947; Chief Labour Commissioner (Central); non-registration/non-listing of application dated 03.11.2024; mandamus sought; respondents bound down to hear and adjudicate within four weeks; petition disposed of on undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Respondents bound to take up the Petitioners' Section 29 ID Act application for hearing, adjudicate it at the earliest, and pass the order through Respondent No.2 within four weeks from 02.04.2025. ¶¶20

Sajjan Mani Tripathi & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of Decision: 02.04.2025

¶4

- W.P.(C) 4124/2025 SAJJAN MANI TRIPATHI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shagun Shahi Chugh, SPC with Ms. Nandita Mishra and Ms. Meera Chugh, Advs.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶9

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)

¶10

The prayers in the present Petition read as follows:

¶11

“A. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of Mandamus directing Management, the Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) to immediately register and adjudicate upon the Petitioner's application (Annexure-4) filed under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and take appropriate action against the Management for noncompliance.

¶12

B. Pass any other or further order or orders or any other ad-interim order(s) / direction(s) that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case and in the interest of justice.”

¶13

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the prayer in the present Petition is limited. The Petitioners have filed an Application under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 before the Chief Labour Commissioner, Delhi on 03.11.2024 and that the Application is neither being registered nor being listed for hearing.

¶14

Issue Notice.

¶15

W.P.(C) 4124/2025 Page 1 of 2

¶16

Signature Not Verified

¶17

Digitally Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Da te:0 4.04.2025 19:28:59

¶18

3.1 Learned Counsel for the Respondents accepts Notice.

¶19

With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing and final disposal today.

¶20

Learned Counsel for the Respondents, on instructions, submits that the application which has been filed by the Petitioner shall be taken up for hearing and adjudicated at the earliest, and that the order in respect thereof shall be passed by Respondent No.2 within a period of four weeks from today.

¶21

5.1 The Respondents are bound down by the statement made by the learned Counsel for the Respondents today.

¶22

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that in view thereof, the Petition may be disposed of since the grievance of the Petitioners has been satisfied.

¶23