Petitioner sought to challenge an award but noted a typographical error in it; the writ petition was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh once the award stands rectified.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
Through: Mr. Shwetank Sharma, Advocate.
NATERPAL AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Urvi Mohan, Advocate for R- 2/GNCTD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R % 01.04.2025
CM APPL. 18605/2025 [Exemption]
W.P.(C) 4005/2025 & CM APPL. 18604/2025 [Stay]
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
APRIL 1, 2025/ ha
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2025 at 14:01:11
Ikon Retails Pvt Ltd
Naterpal
Anr
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
