Indian Bank v. National Commission for Scheduled Castes & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought leave to withdraw its writ petition; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application.
The petitioner sought leave to withdraw its writ petition; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
Through: Mr. Ayush Chaudhary and Mr. Devanshu Yadav, Advs. (through v/c)
NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES & ANR.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. CG for R-1. Mr. Sumit Chander, Mr. Gurdeep Chauhan, Advs. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 03.04.2025
SACHIN DATTA, J
APRIL 3, 2025/ cl
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 13:05:10
Indian Bank
National Commission for Scheduled Castes
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court