Appeal concerning possession of a tenanted property; possession already handed over and mediation on arrears of rent, use and occupation charges, and water/electricity dues failed. The Division Bench closed the appeal with all contentions left open to the parties before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
LINKY DHINGRA ..... APPELLANT Through: Ms Mahima Malhotra with Mr Pratyansh Pandey, Advs.
versus
NEELAM BHATIANI ..... RESPONDENT Through: Mr Varun Maheshwari with Mr Manan Soni, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/06/2024 at 12:20:04
contentions both on facts and in law are kept open to enable the appellant to put forth the same before the trial court.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
JANUARY 23, 2024 /pmc
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
RFA(COMM) 178/2023 2/2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/06/2024 at 12:20:04
Linky Dhingra
Neelam Bhatiani
Rajiv Shakdher
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A first appeal against a decree of a Commercial Court under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
