This single-paragraph order allowed the appellant's application to withdraw his matrimonial appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and the next hearing date was cancelled.
The application to withdraw the appeal was allowed; the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
BRIGADIER VIKRAM SINGH ..... Appellant
Through: Mr Surender Singh, Advocate
versus
DR ARADHANA SINGH ..... Respondent
Through: Ms Shreya Munoth, Mr Ishaan Karki, Ms Sitamsini Cherukumalli and Mr Khush Aalam Singh, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 24.01.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM No. 4510/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:30:48
post-retirement and his release thereafter, will have no impact on the disposable income available with the appellant.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 257/2023
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 24, 2024/ rt
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 257/2023
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:30:48
Brigadier Vikram Singh
Dr Aradhana Singh
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
