An order dismissing a withdrawn appeal regarding contempt proceedings. The appellant withdrew the appeal but sought to place a specific aspect concerning an affidavit before the learned Single Judge, to whom the matter was remitted.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty to place a specific aspect before the learned Single Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
RENU BHANDARI AND ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr Adv. with Mr Sumit Rajput, Mr Sourabh Rajput and Ms Aditi Prakash, Advs.
versus
ASHOK GARG ..... Respondent Through: Mr Jitender Chaudhary, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 19.01.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM Appls.3461-62/2024
EFA(OS) 2/2024 & CM APPLs.3460, 3463/2024
2.1 However, Mr Nandrajog says that the affidavit-in-reply dated 23.01.2023 was lodged with the Registry on the same date i.e., the date when signatures were appended on the affidavit .
EFA(OS) 2/2024 1/2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:08:42
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 19, 2024 /pmc
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
EFA(OS) 2/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:08:42
RENU BHANDARI AND ANR
ASHOK GARG
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
