Appellants sought to withdraw an appeal after the matter was settled through mediation. The High Court allowed the application to withdraw the appeal and directed a 50% refund of court fees.
Refund of 50% court fees; appeal withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~90
versus
SMT. AMEETA SUGANDH ..... RESPONDENT Through: Counsel. (slip not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R % 18.01.2024 CM APPL. 3304/2024
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
JANUARY 18, 2024 M
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 06:25:18
Smt. Nandini Chaudhary & Ors.
Smt. Ameeta Sugandh
Vibhu BakhrU
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A first appeal against a decree of a Commercial Court under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
