The High Court of Delhi permitted the withdrawal by the appellants of an appeal and an application for condonation of delay. The underlying matter regarding impleadment was disposed of by dismissing the application as withdrawn.
The appeal and the application for condonation of delay were allowed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
KAMLESH GUPTA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr Ravi Bassi with Mr Nitin Kumar and Mr Sumit Kumar, Advs. for Appellant no.1 and LR’s of Appellant no.2.
versus
V.N. VERMA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms Shivani Luthra with Ms Simran Khurana and Ms Ishita Soni, Advs. for R-2/Veena Mahajan.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 22.01.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM Appl.19819/2023
EFA(OS) 5/2023 & CM Appl.19818/2023
EFA(OS) 5/2023
page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/06/2024 at 12:16:40
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 22, 2024 /pmc
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
EFA(OS) 5/2023
page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/06/2024 at 12:16:40
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamlesh Gupta & Anr.
V.N. Verma & Anr.
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
