The Delhi High Court, in a civil suit, dismissed the plaintiff's application due to non-prosecution. The plaintiff was absent again; the court noted the defendant failed to file proof of deposited costs, remarking on their delay. No interim order was granted.
Suit dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
Through: None.
versus
THE GOVT OF NCTD & ORS. ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Rishikesh Kuamr, ASC, GNCTD, Ms. Sheenu Priya, Mr. Atik Gill, Mr. Sudhir Kumar Shukla & Mr. Sudhir, Advocates for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:04:48
to 3.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
FEBRUARY 8, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:04:48
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit can be dismissed for non-prosecution in the absence of the plaintiff's counsel.
M/S VALECHA ENGINEERING LTD
THE GOVT OF NCTD
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
