Employer sought appointment of a sole arbitrator to recover dues from a resigned lecturer under an arbitration clause in the Service Rules Manual. The court found a valid arbitration agreement and referred the petition to DIAC for appointment of an arbitrator.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
AAKASH EDUCATIONAL SERVICES LTD.
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pranav Proothi and Ms. Manasi Chatpalliwar, Advocates.
versus
MRS. POOJALA DEEPIKA
..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.s Sridhar R. Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 09.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:59:13
present petition has been filed for appointment of the Sole Arbitrator.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024/va
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:59:13
1 issue framed by the court
Does a valid arbitration agreement exist under Clause 61(b) of the Service Rules Manual so that an arbitrator may be appointed?
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Aakash Educational Services Ltd.
Mrs. Poojala Deepika
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
