Petition under Section 29A(4) sought extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate to conclude proceedings and pass an award. With respondent's no objection, the court extended the mandate by six months and disposed of the petition.
Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended for six months, till 26.08.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
Through: Mr. Virender Kumnar Sharma, Mr. Sumit Rajput, Advs.
RITES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Varma, Ms. Riya Wasade, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 05.02.2024
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 71/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:33:29
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 5, 2024/AR..
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:33:29
1 issue framed by the court
Should the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal be extended for six months under Section 29A(4)?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S MGCPL-ATEPL (JV)
RITES LIMITED
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
