Allowed

Indiabulls Distribution Services Limited v. Bellagio Projects Private Limited

Delhi HC1 Feb 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/423/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 29A sought extension of the arbitrator's mandate, allegedly filed after its lapse. Following this Court's decision in ATC Telecom Infrastructure, which dissented from the Calcutta High Court's view in Rohan Builders, the Court held the petition maintainable and extended the mandate by six months.

What the court decided

AI extract

Indiabulls Distribution Services Limited Vs Bellagio Projects… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~14

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 423/2023

¶4

INDIABULLS DISTRIBUTION SERVICES LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Ms. Tushita Ghosh, Ms. Isha Singh and Mr. Rohit, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

BELLAGIO PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Mr. Rinku Narula and Mr. Rishi Kant Singh, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R % 01.02.2024

¶9

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”], for extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal, which is in seisin of disputes between the parties under an agreement dated 17.05.2014. The Tribunal was constituted pursuant to an order of this Court dated 23.11.2021 in ARB.P. 138/2020.

¶10

I am informed that the proceedings are at the stage of crossexamination of the claimant’s witness.

¶11

Mr. Bhupesh Narula, learned counsel for the respondent, submits that the present petition has been filed after the lapse of the mandate of

¶12

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 423/2023

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2024 at 12:44:49

¶16

the Tribunal, which is contrary to the scheme of Section 29A of the Act. He states that the mandate of the Tribunal lapsed on 20.08.2023 whereas the petition was filed only on 07.09.2023. He submits that this question is pending in the Supreme Court in SLP (C) 23320/2023 [ Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Berger Paints India Ltd. ] arising out of a decision of the Calcutta High Court in a judgment dated 06.09.2023 in Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Berger Paints India Limited (2023 SCC OnLine Cal 2645) and connected matters. However, this Court has taken a contrary view in ATC Telecom Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. BSNL (2023 SCC OnLine Del 7135), and has expressly dissented from the view taken by the Calcutta High Court in Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Berger Paints India Limited . The petition is therefore not liable to be rejected on this ground.

¶17

There is no other objection to the relief sought in this petition.

¶18

In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and the mandate of the learned Arbitrator is extended for a period of six months form today. 6. Learned counsel for the parties assure the Court that they will cooperate with the learned Arbitral Tribunal for expeditious disposal of the proceedings.

¶19

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶20

FEBRUARY 1, 2024 SS/

¶21

Page 2 of 2

¶22

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 423/2023

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2024 at 12:44:49

Indiabulls Distribution Services Limited v. Bellagio Projects Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Indiabulls Distribution Services Limited v. Bellagio Projects Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs Transstroy Dindigul Theni Kumili Tollways Pvt. Ltd., & Anr.

The South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs Transstroy Trichy Karaikudi Tollways Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

M/S Hamdard Laboratories (India) Vs M/S Sterling Electro Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Eurasian Minerals and Enterprises Private Limited Vs Nitya Niranjan Khampariya

M/S Bsa Citi Couriers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Franchise India Holding Ltd.

M/S Mgcpl-Atepl (Jv) Vs Rites Limited

Premco Rail Enginners Ltd. Vs Container Corporation of India Ltd.

Hpcl Mittal Energy Limited Vs Hello Electronics Private Limited

M/S. Hansalaya Holdings Vs J & S Pvt. Limited and Another

Rahul Talwar Vs Wave Megaa City Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Akasa Finance Limited Vs M/S Arvind Road Carrier Private Limited & Ors.

M/S. Tata Aldesa (Jv) Vs M/S. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited

Quality Engineers and Contractors Vs Dy Chief Electrical Engineer Contructions

Ashi Limited Vs Union of India