Allowed

M/S Mili Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Ambience Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi HC6 Feb 2024O.M.P. (MISC.)/2/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed petitions seeking extension of an Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The arbitrator's mandate was extended to 30.09.2024 based on the parties' agreement and the voluminous nature of the record.

What did the court decide?

The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended to 30.09.2024.

M/S Mili Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Ambience Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~28 to 30

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P. (MISC.) 2/2024

¶4

M/S MILI MARKETING PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. P. Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mishra, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LTD & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Chitkara, Adv.(VC)

¶7

- O.M.P. (MISC.) 3/2024 M/S MORAN PLANTATIONS PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. P. Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mishra, Advs.

¶8

versus

¶9

M/S AMBIENCE PRIVATE LTD & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Chitkara, Adv.(VC)

¶10

- O.M.P. (MISC.) 4/2024 M/S PARASRAMKA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. P. Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mishra, Advs.

¶11

versus

¶12

M/S AMBIENCE PRIVATE LTD & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Chitkara, Adv.(VC)

¶13

CORAM:

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

% 06.02.2024

¶17

I.A. 2818/2024 (exemption) in O.M.P. (MISC.) 2/2024 I.A. 2819/2024(exemption) in O.M.P. (MISC.) 3/2024 I.A. 2820/2024 (exemption) in O.M.P. (MISC.) 4/2024

¶18

Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:01:33

¶20

O.M.P. (MISC.) 2/2024, O.M.P. (MISC.) 3/2024, O.M.P. (MISC.) 4/2024

¶21

By way of the present petition filed under Section 29A-(4) and 29A (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks an extension the of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for concluding the Arbitral proceedings and passing the Award.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits the mandate is expiring on 31.01.2024 and the proceedings are at the stage of final hearing before the learned arbitrator.

¶23

Issue notice.

¶24

Mr. Akshay Chitkara, learned counsel for the respondents has accepted the notice and submits that the mandate may be extended for 30.09.2024.

¶25

Both the learned counsel for the parties submit that in fact there are six arbitration petitions pending and the record is bulky and voluminous in nature and requires a lot of calculations.

¶26

Considering the aforesaid request and the no objection given by the other side, the present petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended.

¶27

In view of the request made, the mandate is extended till 30.09.2024 and present petitions are disposed of.

¶28

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶29

FEBRUARY 6, 2024 Pallavi

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:01:33

M/S Mili Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Ambience Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Mili Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Ambience Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Mgcpl-Atepl (Jv) Vs Rites Limited

M/S Bsa Citi Couriers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Franchise India Holding Ltd.

Zenith Dance Institute Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ambience Developers and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Mahender Pal Singh Vs Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

Tata Capital Financial Service Limited Vs M/S Aastha International & Ors.

Regclan Products Private Limited Vs Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited