Disposed

Vijay Dhalla v. M/S Prateek Realtors India Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC31 Jan 2024O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/103/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court converted a petition filed under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 into one under Section 11. The court appointed Mr. Kushank Sindhu as an arbitrator via mutual consent to adjudicate the dispute and directed the arbitration to be conducted under the DIAC.

What did the court decide?

Mr. Kushank Sindhu was appointed as the arbitrator; the parties were directed to approach him within two weeks.

Vijay Dhalla Vs M/S Prateek Realtors India Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 103/2022

¶4

VIJAY DHALLA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Akhil Goyal, Advocate Ms.Amita Gupta and Ms.BhawnaBhati, Advts.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S PRATEEK REALTORS INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sudeep Singh,Mr.Akul Mehandru and Mr.VaibhavMehal, Advts.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R % 31.01.2024

¶10

The hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).

¶11

The present petition has been filed under Sections14& 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an independent arbitrator. The petitioner states that the sole arbitrator Ms.Pooja Dewan, Advocate has withdrawn herself from the arbitration and therefore another arbitrator is required to be appointed. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that though he has no objection to the appointment of an independent arbitrator, however, the present petition under Sections 14 & 15 is not maintainable and that earlier the arbitrator was appointed unilaterally by the petitioner.

¶12

With the consent of the parties, the present petition is converted into a petition under Section 11. Since the agreement containing arbitration clause

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:09:19

¶14

is not disputed and both the parties have consented to the reference to the arbitral tribunal, the present petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶15

i) The disputes between the parties under the said agreement are referred to the arbitral tribunal.

¶16

ii) As agreed by both the counsels for the parties, Mr.Kushank Sindhu, Advocate, Enrl.No.D/4493/2014 (Mobile No.7065488258) is appointed as an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶17

iii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi hereinafter, referred to as the „DIAC‟). The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of Schedule IV of the A&C Act or as the parties may agree.

¶18

iv) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference.

¶19

v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims on merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶20

vi) The parties shall approach the learned arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶21

The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶22

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶23

JANUARY 31, 2024/ rb.

¶24

Vijay Dhalla v. M/S Prateek Realtors India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Dhalla v. M/S Prateek Realtors India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Hamdard Laboratories (India) Vs M/S Sterling Electro Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Sms Ltd. (Formerly Known as Sms Infrastructure Ltd.) Vs Airport Authority of India

R.S.Khanna and Sons Vs Rites Ltd. through Its Executive Director & Anr.

Zenith Dance Institute Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ambience Developers and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Bsa Citi Couriers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Franchise India Holding Ltd.

M/S Mgcpl-Atepl (Jv) Vs Rites Limited