Petition under Section 29A to extend the arbitral tribunal's mandate for disputes under a 2013 contract; respondent consented and proceedings were at final arguments stage.
Mandate of the arbitrator extended for six months from 14.03.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S. TATA ALDESA (JV) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Das, Advocate.
versus
M/S. DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arpan Behl and Mr. Abhishek Shrivastava, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 01.02.2024
PRATEEK JALAN, J
FEBRUARY 1, 2024/ SS/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2024 at 12:44:48
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the arbitral tribunal in seisin of the parties' disputes should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S. Tata Aldesa (JV)
M/S. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
