Petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate. The court granted a six-month extension with the consent of both parties.
Extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of six months w.e.f. 20.04.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
Through: Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates.
versus
ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Sharma and Ms. Jigyasa Sharma, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 21.05.2024
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 418/2024
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/05/2024 at 11:48:26
four months from 20.04.2024, learned counsel for the parties jointly request that the extension may be granted for a period of six months w.e.f. 20.04.2024.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MAY 21, 2024 SS/
Page 2 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 418/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/05/2024 at 11:48:26
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Atul Sethi
Orchid Infrastructure Developrs Pvt Ltd
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
