Arbitration petition withdrawn at counsel's request after documents attached to the petition were found not in order, with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
MR. IVAN JOHN & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 20.05.2024 I.A. 29610/2024 ( for exemption )
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
ARB.P. 675/2024
The documents attached to the petition are not in order. Mr. Balvinder Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty institute a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MAY 20, 2024 “Bhupi”/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2024 at 11:51:00
M/S Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited
Mr. Ivan John
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
