Disposed

Gail Gas Limited v. Okay Glass Industries

Delhi HC20 May 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/406/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition seeking an extension of the Sole Arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court was satisfied by the proceedings timeline and mutual consent, extending the mandate till 31st December 2024.

What did the court decide?

Extension of the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator till 31st December, 2024.

Gail Gas Limited Vs Okay Glass Industries — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~49

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 406/2024

¶4

GAIL GAS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepayan Mandal, Mr. Mridul Bansal & Mr. Naman Varma, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

OKAY GLASS INDUSTRIES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. (M: 9539106247)

¶7

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 20.05.2024

¶8

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶9

The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-GAIL Gas Ltd. under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, ‘1996 Act’) seeking extension of the mandate of the ld. Sole Arbitrator.

¶10

According to the petition, the Respondent-Okay Glass Industries required a suitable energy source for its glass works in the Taj Trapezium Area and switched to natural gas, entering into a Gas Supply Contract (‘GSC’) with GAIL (India) Ltd. on 28th June, 2007. GAIL Gas was required to supply gas to the Respondent, which was billed in terms of the GSC entered into between the parties. Thereafter, in March 2018, as per the petition, the Petitioner discovered manipulation of certain data in another customer, prompting an investigation that revealed similar manipulation in the Respondent’s data, leading to under-billing. Thus, disputes arose between the parties, leading the Petitioner to initiate arbitration proceedings

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2024 at 12:04:17

¶12

on 3rd June, 2022, and appoint a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute.

¶13

The ld. Sole Arbitrator entered reference on 14th July, 2022. The cross-examination of the Claimant’s Witness was carried out over 11 sittings, and was finally concluded on 5th February, 2024. The initial oneyear time period prescribed under Section 29A(1) of the 1996 Act expired on 4th December, 2023. With mutual consent, the period was extended by six months, which is now due to expire on 4th June, 2024. As noted by the ld. Sole Arbitrator on 3rd May, 2024, the Respondent has also given its no objection to the extension. Hence, the present petition.

¶14

Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the stage of the proceeding is that the Petitioner/Claimant’s submissions are currently being heard. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent has no objection to the extension being sought. In view thereof, the mandate of the ld. Sole Arbitrator is extended till 31st December, 2024.

¶15

The petition is disposed of. All pending applications are disposed of.

¶16

Dasti.

¶17

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶18

MAY 20, 2024 dj/dn

¶19

Gail Gas Limited v. Okay Glass Industries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gail Gas Limited v. Okay Glass Industries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Epc Constructions India Limited Vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited

Sunrise Embedded Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Design Graphics & Anr.

Mbl Infrastrucutre Ltd. Vs Pradeep Colonisers and Suppliers Pvt. Ltd.

Prl Projects and Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Public Works Department

Reliance Infrastrcuture Limited Vs Aravali Power Company Private Limited

Dsc Limited Vs Union of India

Rohit Desai Vs Emaar India Limited

Atul Sethi Vs Orchid Infrastructure Develoers Pvt. Ltd.

Amanpreet Kohli Vs Pankaj Dayal

Ms Suparna Sachdev Vs Sh.Sunil Sachdev & Ors.

Mbl Infrastrucutre Ltd. Vs Pradeep Colonisers and Suppliers Pvt. Ltd.

Sh. Kulbhushan Chawla and Ors. Vs Smt. Veena Chawla and Ors.

Kulbhushan Chawla Vs Kamla Devi Chawla & Ors.

M/S Krishna Enterprises Vs Union of India through Ministry of Railways and Anr.