Honble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan allowed the exemption application and dismissed the main arbitration petition as withdrawn with liberty to institute a fresh petition on the same cause of action due to improper document attachment.
Exemption allowed for I.A.; Main petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to institute fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
MANAV SETHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Anu Monga, Mr. Rahul Goel, Mr. Shobhit Sharma, Ms. Astha Baderiya, Mr. Aman Kant Mishra, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 20.05.2024
I.A. 29614/2024 ( for exemption )
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
ARB.P. 676/2024
The documents attached to the petition are not in order. Mr. Balvinder Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty institute a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MAY 20, 2024 “Bhupi”/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2024 at 11:51:09
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner was entitled to withdraw the original petition with liberty to institute a fresh one due to improper document attachment.
M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD
MANAV SETHI & ANR
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
