The Delhi High Court considered an application for extension of the Sole Arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after expiration due to delay.
The mandate of the Sole Arbitrator is extended by two months from 12.04.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
MEC ELECTRIC CONTRACTS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
NETAMBIT INFOSOURCE AND E-SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Loomba, Advocate for Defendants 1,3,5, 7.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 20.05.2024
I.A. 29760/2024 (Exemption)
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 408/2024 (under Section 29A (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner for extension of time for passing the Award by the learned Sole Arbitrator)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2024 at 12:04:18
conducting the proceedings before the learned Arbitrator and the respondent has objection to the extension of the mandate.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MAY 20, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2024 at 12:04:18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator expired and, if so, whether it should be extended under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MEC Electric Contracts Pvt Ltd
Netambit Infosource and E-Services Private Limited
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
