Petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate. Respondent raised no objection. The Court allowed the petition and extended the mandate for one year.
Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended by a period of one year from 21.05.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
Through: Mr. Tarang Gupta, Mr. Kartikeya Sharma, Advs. (VC).
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, standing counsel with Ms. Devika Singh Ray Chowdhary, Adv. for R-1/MCD.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 05.04.2024
I.A. 7577/2024
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 267/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:56:56
Arbitral Tribunal is expiring on 21.05.2024.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
APRIL 5, 2024/AR..
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:56:56
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended by a period of one year?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P K Advertising Services Pvt Ltd
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
