The High Court of Delhi extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by six months effective 29.03.2024 upon the respondent's consent under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Mandate of the learned Arbitrator extended by six months from 29.03.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IRB TUMKUR CHITRADURGA TOLLWAY LTD...... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Devika Mohan, Ms. Charu Shriyam Singh, Ms. Pragya Gautam, Mr. Sarthak Sachdeva and Mr. Mohnish, Advocates.
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Mr. Abhay Gupta and Mr. Sanjivan Chakraborty, Advocates.
CORAM:
%
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R 04.04.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
APRIL 4, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2024 at 12:02:25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended by six months after its initial expiry.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
IRB Tumkur Chitradurga Tollway Ltd
National Highways Authority of India
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
