Allowed

Sohan Lal Commodity Management Private Limited v. R R Agrotech

Delhi HC8 Apr 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/277/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed petitions filed under Sections 29A(4) and 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, extending the mandate of a Sole Arbitrator by three months to account for delay in award pronouncement caused by a fire.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the Sole Arbitrator extended by 03 months with effect from today, with proceedings carried on post-expiration validated.

Sohan Lal Commodity Management Private Limited Vs R R Agrotech — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~25 to 27

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 277/2024 & I.A. 7758/2024 SOHAN LAL COMMODITY MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arunal Tewari, Advoate.

¶4

versus

¶5

R R AGROTECH ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashana Bhatia, Advocate via video-conferencing. + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 278/2024 & I.A. 7759/2024 SOHAN LAL COMMODITY MANAGEMENT PRAVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arunal Tewari, Advoate. versus JHAWAR TRADERS ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashana Bhatia, Advocate via video-conferencing.

¶6

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 279/2024 & I.A. 7760/2024 SOHAN LAL COMMODITY MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arunal Tewari, Advoate. versus

¶7

CAPITAL PROPMART PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashana Bhatia, Advocate via video-conferencing.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 08.04.2024

¶9

Page 1 of 3

¶10

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 277/2024 & Conn.

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:24:09

¶12

By way of the present petitions filed under sections 29A(4) & 5 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (‘A&C Act’), the petitioner seeks extension of the mandate of learned Sole Arbitrator, who is seized of the disputes between the parties, by 03 months.

¶13

Mr. Arunal Tewari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits, that the learned Sole Arbitrator was appointed vide orders dated 19.01.2021 made in ARB.P Nos. 478/2010, 481/2010 and 482/2010. Thereafter a consensual extension of mandate was granted for 06 months, as recorded in orders dated 01.03.2023 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator in the 03 matters.

¶14

Mr. Tewari submits, that subsequently, vide order dated 17.11.2023 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this court in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 531/2023 and connected matters, a further extension of 06 months was granted w.e.f. 14.09.2023, which ran-out on 14.03.2024.

¶15

Upon being queried, Mr. Tewari informs the court that the proceedings before the learned Arbitrator stand concluded and award has been reserved. However, by reason of a fire in the office premises of the learned Arbitrator, there is some delay in pronouncing the award.

¶16

Issue notice.

¶17

Ms. Aashana Bhatia, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondents on advance copy; accepts notice; and does not oppose the prayer made.

¶18

Accordingly, the petition is allowed, thereby extending the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator by a period of 03 months with effect

¶19

Page 2 of 3

¶20

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 277/2024 & Conn.

¶21

¶22

from today, while also observing that any arbitral proceedings carriedon after the expiration of the last mandate shall also stand validated and regularised.

¶23

The learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to pronounce the award within the extended period of mandate.

¶24

The petition is disposed-of in the above terms.

¶25

Pending applications, if any, also disposed-of.

¶26

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶27

APRIL 8, 2024 V.Rawat

¶28

Page 3 of 3

¶29

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 277/2024 & Conn.

¶30

Sohan Lal Commodity Management Private Limited v. R R Agrotech

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sohan Lal Commodity Management Private Limited v. R R Agrotech

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punj Lloyd Ltd. through Liqudiator Vs Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction-Ii) North Western Railway

P K Advertising Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Vs Bajaj Infrastructure Development Company Ltd. (Bidco) (Now Known as Anand Engineering Ltd.)

National Commodities Management Services Limited Vs Shree Rice Mill

M/S Bareilly Highways Project Limited Vs M/S National Highways Authority of India

Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Managing Director Delhi State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. Vs Sanjay Passi & Ors.

L. D Sulania and Co. Vs Delhi Transco Ltd.

Propel Shipping Pte Ltd. Vs Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited (Rinl) and Anr.

National Highways Authority of India Vs M/S Gammon India Limited

Bitchem Asphalt Technologies Ltd. Vs Csir Central Road Research Institute

Thdc India Ltd. Vs Jai Prakash Associates Ltd.

S. Jaspreet Singh Proprietor M/S. Metro Lubes Vs Usha Malik, Proprietor M/S. Vanshika Trading Co.

Telecommunication Consultants India Ltd. Vs Shivaa Trading