The High Court of Delhi, under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extended the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal for three months upon the respondent's consent and undertaking to clear pending fees.
The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended for a further period of three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
DILIP BUILDCON LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Ananya Kumar and Ms Shriya Luke, Advs. (M: 8879763709)
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHRITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajeev Krishan Sharma & Mr. Shantanu Singh, Advocates. (m: 9425120031)
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R
% 04.04.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2024 at 12:02:26
four weeks to the ld. Arbitral Tribunal.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
APRIL 4, 2024/ dk/dn
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2024 at 12:02:26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended to adjudicate disputes arising out of the Erection, Procurement, Construction Agreement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DILIP BUILDCON LIMITED
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
