Appeal against a consent order in a matrimonial matter; counsel for the appellant sought and obtained permission to withdraw the appeal, which was dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15.
SH ASHU RAWAT ..... Appellant
Through: Mr M. R. Chanchal, Advocate
versus
DR MEENAL PANDEY ..... Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 19.01.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
AMIT BANSAL, J.
JANUARY 19, 2024 /kd
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:32:20
SH ASHU RAWAT
DR MEENAL PANDEY
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
