A memorandum order where the High Court of Delhi dismissed a withdrawal petition filed by the appellant. The court noted the appellant joined via video conference and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn along with pending applications.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
Through: Ms Rosemary Raju, Advocate.
versus
PRIYANAKA TANWAR ..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 24.01.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
JANUARY 24, 2024 / tr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/06/2024 at 13:57:02
ANURAG SINGH
PRIYANAKA TANWAR
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
