Husband appealed against Family Court order rejecting his prayer to recall his wife for cross-examination, arguing some aspects were not covered. The court noted she had already been cross-examined on two dates and that a change in counsel was not a ground to recall the witness, and dismissed the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUMIT TANWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr C. Parkash and Mr Shrey Tanwar, Advocates.
versus
ANJALI TANWAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr Prateek Chaudhary and Mr Ravinder Kumar, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 29.01.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
3.1 According to Mr Parkash, there are certain aspects qua which crossexamination was not carried out.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 37/2024 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:38:49
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 29, 2024/ kd
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 37/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:38:49
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a wife who had already been cross-examined on two dates could be recalled for further cross-examination merely because counsel changed?
Sumit Tanwar
Anjali Tanwar
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
