Appellant sought restoration of a matrimonial appeal and condonation of delay in filing and re-filing. No representation appeared and process fee was not filed; the applications were dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
PUSHPA ..... Appellant Through: None. versus YOGENDER KUMAR DABAS ..... Respondent Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 19.02.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
C.M. Nos. 25248/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking restoration of the appeal] , 25249/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal] & 25250/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2024/ kd
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/02/2024 at 12:47:22
Pushpa
Yogender Kumar Dabas
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
