Matrimonial appeal disposed of in terms of a settlement agreement dated 14.02.2024, signed by the parties and supported by affidavits. The parties confirmed before the court that the settlement was executed with free will and without coercion, and were directed to abide by its terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27.
Through: Mr Sanjay K Chadha, Advocate.
versus
VANDANA MADAN ..... Respondent
Through: Mr Dhanesh Relan, Mr Arindam Dey and Mr Aditya Pandey, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 16.02.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
1.1 Counsel for the parties have identified the signatures of their respective clients.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 16/2023
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2024 at 10:54:07
say that the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the SA.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2024 kd
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 16/2023
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2024 at 10:54:07
Sameer Madan
Vandana Madan
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
