This two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed a review petition (No. 121/2024) filed in meritless of the underlying matter, without citing any substantive legal grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
LOKESH PRABHAKAR ..... Appellant
Through: Appellant in person. Mr Mahesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate.
versus
ARCHANA PRABHAKAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr Satya Ranjan, Mr Kautilya Birat and Mr Ankush Kapoor, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 10.05.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
REVIEW PET. 121/2024
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MAY 10, 2024/ at
AMIT BANSAL, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:50:55
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition has any merit and should be dismissed.
Lokesh Prabhakar
Archana Prabhakar
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
