Matrimonial appeal withdrawn by the appellant in view of a settlement agreement with the respondent; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25.
SANTOSH ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. D.S. Dagar, Advocate along with appellant in person.
versus
MOHINDER SINGH MALIK ..... Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 19.02.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM APPL. 9880/2024
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 293/2018 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:32:58
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 293/2018
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2024 B.S. Rohella
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 293/2018
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:32:58
Santosh
Mohinder Singh Malik
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
