Matrimonial appeal disposed of on basis of a settlement agreement under which parties agreed to live together as husband and wife. The court found the SA lawful, set aside the Family Court divorce decree dated 13.04.2018 in HMA No. 168 of 2018, vacated the interim order, and directed compliance with the settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12.
SUNITA ..... Appellant
Through: None.
versus
OM PRAKASH ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 21.02.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 144/2018
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/02/2024 at 15:23:15
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 21, 2024/ rt Click here to check corrigendum, if any
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 144/2018
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/02/2024 at 15:23:15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court divorce decree dated 13.04.2018 should be set aside in terms of the parties' settlement agreement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunita
Om Prakash
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
