The plaintiff sought to withdraw an arbitration-related suit with liberty to revive if the defendant sought enforcement of final awards. Relying on Supreme Court precedent regarding the enforceability of awards after a period of time, the court permitted withdrawal with the stated liberty.
Withdrawal of suit with liberty to revive
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
HEXA TRADEX LIMITED .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Nilava Bandyopadhyay and Ms. Ankita Sinha, Advs.
versus
FORCE SHIPPING LINE CO & ANR .....Defendants Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 18.10.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/10/2024 at 12:52:00
elapsed from the date of the award.
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
OCTOBER 18, 2024 N.S. ASWAL
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/10/2024 at 12:52:00
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Government of India vs. Vedanta Ltd. & Ors.Referred¶12
Government of India vs. Vedanta Ltd. & Ors. (2020) 10 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
