Disposed

Lalit Kumar Shandilya v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC16 Oct 2024W.P.(C)/2724/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought demolition of a dilapidated property. Court noted MCD had already initiated proceedings under Section 348 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. Petition dismissed as no further orders required; MCD directed to act strictly in law.

What did the court decide?

Petition and accompanying application disposed of without being allowed; MCD directed to act strictly in accordance with law.

Lalit Kumar Shandilya Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Landlord and Tenant | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~34

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2724/2022 & CM APPL. 7798/2022

¶4

LALIT KUMAR SHANDILYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Mr. Monish Kumar Gaur & Mr. Ritesh Kumar Kaushik, Advocates. [M:9996927923]

¶5

versus

¶6

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Jagrati Singh, SC for MCD with Mr. Praveen Kumar, Ms. Vani Sharma, Mr. Rajpal & Mr. Surender Kumar, Advocates for MCD.

¶7

Mr. Mukesh Goyal, Advocate for R-5. Mr. Abhinav Singh & Mr. Praveen Kumar Kaushik, Advocates for Delhi Police. SI Amit Dahiya, PS Nabi Karim.

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R

¶9

% 16.10.2024

¶10

The petitioner claims to be the owner of property bearing No. 8564-8566 Basti Arakshan Road, Paharganj, Delhi-110055 . He has filed this writ petition contending that a building on the property is in a dilapidated condition and liable to be demolished. It is stated that some parts of the building were earlier rented out, but most of the tenants have either vacated or died, and that the respondent Nos. 4 to 6 are in illegal possession of the parts of the property.

¶11

There are also apparently civil proceedings pending, at the instance

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

W.P.(C) 2724/2022

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 21:00:01

¶15

of the occupants of the property, against the petitioner herein.

¶16

In the meanwhile, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi [“MCD”] has filed a status report dated 14.10.2024 in which it is stated that the subject property was found to be in dangerous condition and a notice for taking necessary repairs/strengthening was therefore issued under Section 348 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 on 28.10.2021. In view of the fact that owners and occupiers failed to comply with it, a vacation notice was issued on 21.03.2023.

¶17

Mr. Mukesh Goyal, learned counsel for respondent No. 5 states that he has filed W.P.(C) 3949/2023 against the aforesaid notice, which remains pending in this Court.

¶18

In view of the fact that the relief sought by the writ petitioner, for action to be taken in respect of the dilapidated property, has been initiated by the MCD, no further orders are required in the present writ petition, which stands disposed of. 6. It is made clear that the MCD is directed to act strictly in accordance with law and after compliance of all statutory formalities qua owner/occupiers of the suit property, including respondent Nos. 4 to 6. The rights and contentions of the parties in the civil suit, and of respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in respect of any legal remedies which they may have against the action of MCD, are reserved.

¶19

The petition, alongwith the pending application, is disposed of with these observations.

¶20

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶21

OCTOBER 16, 2024/ ‘pv’/

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

W.P.(C) 2724/2022

¶24

Lalit Kumar Shandilya v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalit Kumar Shandilya v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fareeda Jalal Vs Union of India and Ors.

M/S Paras Lubricants Ltd. Vs Punjab National Bank & Ors.

Primatel Fibcom Ltd. Vs Gail (India) Limited

Sh. R.S. Meena Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Harsh Vardhan Bansal Vs Acit Circle 43(1) New Delhi & Anr.

Dr Shiv Chopra and Anr. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs Usha Singh

Samir Sardana Vs Central Information Commission & Anr.

Sugandha Sethi Vs Sudhir Puri & Anr.

Neelam Alias Sweta Vs Munesh Devi and Anr.

J.P Sharma Vs State Bank of India & Ors.

Hemant Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Victorious Real Estate Private Limited Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation

Nand Ram Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi Earlier Known as Sdmc & Anr.