Plaintiff sought partition, permanent injunction and recovery of rent for a one-fourth share in suit property. He stated in court that he wished to abandon the claim; the court permitted withdrawal of the suit in toto without a formal application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~81
Through: Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate with Plaintiff in person
versus
RAMESH LAKRA AND OTHERS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate for Defendant No. 6/Attar Singh
CORAM:
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
OCTOBER 21, 2024 hsk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2024 at 14:26:29
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep
Ramesh Lakra and Others
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
