The Delhi High Court dismissed a suit and vacated an interim order for non-prosecution. The Court found the plaintiff not interested in proceeding given the failure to prosecute despite a previous warning and lack of process fee filing.
Vacated the interim order dated 15.02.2023 and dismissed the suit for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
versus
NILOFAR IPNINDER SINGH & ORS. .....Defendants Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 16.10.2024
“$~17
Through: Ms. Shalini Jolly, Advocate (through VC)
versus
NILOFAR IPNINDER SINGH & ORS. .....Defendants
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R
CS(OS) 112/2023 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 22:33:51
take steps for issuance of summons on the defendants.
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
AUGUST 8, 2024/ msh/MG”
(Emphasis supplied)
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
OCTOBER 16, 2024/ rhc/MG
CS(OS) 112/2023 Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 22:33:51
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to prosecute after a prior warning
Whether the interim order passed in favour of the plaintiff should stand vacated due to non-prosecution
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Tej Kohli
Nilofar Ipnder Singh
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
