Disposed

Burger King( a Unit of Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd) (Connaught Place) v. New Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Delhi HC18 Oct 2024W.P.(C)/12155/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a Show Cause Notice seeking cancellation of a health license due to mezzanine floor usage. The court directed the respondent to grant a personal hearing and pass a final order, preserving interim protection.

What did the court decide?

Directions to respondent for personal hearing on 05.11.2024 and to pass final order; interim protection continued for 3 weeks post-final order.

Burger King( a Unit of Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd)… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~21

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 12155/2022 & CM APPL. 36324/2022 BURGER KING( A UNIT OF RESTAURANT BRANDS ASIA LTD)(CONNAUGHT PLACE) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj and Ms. Nehmat Sethi, Advocates.

¶4

versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, SC with Ms. Sabana Khatun and Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Achal Gupta, Advocate for R- 2. Insp. Vijay Kaushik, Licensing Unit, Delhi Police.

¶5

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R

¶6

% 18.10.2024

¶7

The present writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution, is directed against a Show Cause Notice dated 27.07.2022 by which the respondent-New Delhi Municipal Council [“NDMC”], directed the petitioner to explain why the health license given by it to the petitioner, should not be cancelled on account of use of the mezzanine floor of the petitioner’s restaurant for seating, rather than the ground floor alone.

¶8

Despite several opportunities, the respondent has not brought its counter affidavit on record. It may be noted that the last opportunity of two weeks was granted for filing of the counter affidavit on 02.02.2024. 3. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has been

¶9

Page 1 of 2

¶10

W.P.(C) 12155/2022

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 09:05:08

¶12

protected by an interim order dated 22.08.2022, to the effect that no precipitate action would be taken against the petitioner with respect to the impugned Show Cause Notice. This order has subsisted for more than two years.

¶13

As the writ petition is directed against a Show Cause Notice, I am of the view that it would be appropriate to direct the respondent to take a final decision while continuing with the protection already granted to the petitioner.

¶14

The petition is, therefore, disposed of with the following directions:

¶15

A.The present writ petition will be treated as a reply to the Show Cause Notice.

¶16

B.The respondent is directed to grant a personal hearing to the petitioner on 05.11.2024 at 11:30 A.M. before the Deputy Director (Health Licensing), who had issued the Show Cause Notice. The petitioner may also furnish any additional documents if required at the said hearing.

¶17

C.The final order will be passed thereafter in accordance with law, and will be communicated to the petitioner, additionally, through learned counsel on record in this petition.

¶18

D.The interim protection granted to the petitioner will continue for a period of 3 weeks after the final order is passed, in order to enable the petitioner to take its legal remedies, if it so wishes.

¶19

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶20

OCTOBER 18, 2024/ MR/

¶21

Page 2 of 2

¶22

W.P.(C) 12155/2022

¶23

Burger King( a Unit of Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd) (Connaught Place) v. New Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Burger King( a Unit of Restaurant Brands Asia Ltd) (Connaught Place) v. New Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Goel Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Hemant Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Harshidhi Security Services Vs Delhi Development Authority (Dda)

Vijendra Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Nitin Gupta Vs Reliance Commercial Finance Limited

M/S Appy Pie LLP and Anr. Vs the Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Smt. Raj Rani Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Mainpal & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Hemant Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Lalit Kumar Shandilya Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Victorious Real Estate Private Limited Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation

Dr Shiv Chopra and Anr. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Dr. Amitabh Maini Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Ram Jeevan Sharma Vs Muncipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.