Disposed
Ajit Gogna v. the Commissioner of Police & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/715/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC (criminal) for the State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Mr. Sagar Mehlawat, Advocates. SI Navin and SI Kunji Lal.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 17.05.2024
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly
i) Issue a direction to respondent No.l to transfer investigation of complaint dated 20.10.2018 served on respondent No.l vide Diary No.2934 of petitioner against respondent no.2 to 7 from local police to crime branch of Delhi Police OR any other investigating agency. ii) Any other relief this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the present circumstances may also be granted in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents.”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 13:04:59
AMIT SHARMA, J MAY 17, 2024 /sn
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 13:04:59
Ajit Gogna
The Commissioner of Police & Ors
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court