Allowed

Dalip Alies Karan v. State Government of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC20 May 2024W.P.(CRL)/622/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi modified a parole order dated 20.05.2024 granted to the petitioner, who was in custody for 14 years and 09 months. The Court dispensed with the requirement to furnish a Surety Bond while retaining the condition for a Personal Bond.

What did the court decide?

The condition of furnishing a Surety Bond is dispensed with; the petitioner is directed to be released on parole subject to a Personal Bond of Rs. 10,000/-.

Dalip Alies Karan Vs State Government of NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~A1

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 622/2024

¶4

DALIP ALIES KARAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Digant Mishra, Ms. Kashmira Lambat, Mr. Abhinav Deshwal, Mr. Zainab Siddiqui, Ms. Akshura Sharma, Mr. Ujjwal Bharadwaj, Mr. Dipankar Singh and Mr. Yashwardhan Singh, Advs. versus

¶5

STATE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advs. with Insp. Pawan Kumar SI Ankit Sagar PS Neb Sarai

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶8

O R D E R % 06.08.2024

¶9

CRL.M.A. 23176/2024 (under Section 438 of BNSS for modification of terms and conditions of order dated 20.05.2024)

¶10

The present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking limited modification of the order dated 20.05.2024 whereby the petitioner was directed to be released on parole for a period of six weeks from the date of his release subject to his furnishing a Personal Bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/and one Surety Bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent, further subject to the conditions stated therein.

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 12:02:16

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner / applicant submits that the petitioner is in custody for the last 14 years and he has lost all his social ties and thus, the petitioner is not in a position to arrange for the Surety Bond.

¶13

It is not in dispute that the petitioner is in custody for the past 14 years and 09 months. Thus, there appears to be substance in the submission of the learned counsel that the petitioner has lost all his social ties and is not in a position to arrange for the Surety Bond.

¶14

The petitioner was granted parole by this Court vide order dated 20.05.2024 and since then the petitioner has not been able to avail the same for the want of a Surety Bond.

¶15

In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that the order dated 20.05.2024 deserves to be modified.

¶16

Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner be released on parole for a period of six weeks from the date of his release subject to his furnishing Personal Bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-. The condition of furnishing Surety Bond is dispensed with.

¶17

With the aforesaid modification the present application is disposed of.

¶18

Copy of the order be forwarded to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary compliance and information.

¶19

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

¶20

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶21

AUGUST 6, 2024 N.S. ASWAL

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 12:02:16

Dalip Alies Karan v. State Government of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dalip Alies Karan v. State Government of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Jain Vs State & Anr.

Emaar India Limited & Anr. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ajit Gogna Vs the Commissioner of Police & Ors.

Sunil Kapoor and Anrs Vs B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Limited

Jitendra Singh Lunawat Vs State NCT of Delhi

Pooja Luthra Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Ram Babu Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Rajjan @ Ashu Chauhan Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Ashish @ Anup Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mohit Singh Shekhawat Vs State (Gnctd) & Anr.

Sanjay Sharma Vs the State Goverment of NCT of Delhi

Yunus Khan Vs State NCT of Delhi

Vishnu Gupta Vs Union of Inida through Home Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

Gulshan Singh Vs State