Dhananjay Prahlad Salunke v. the State & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismissed a writ petition allowed due to the petitioner's non-prosecution on the last date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State with Ms. Mansi Gosain, Mr. Mukesh Dagar, Mr. Naresh Dagar, Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Soumya Sharma, Mr. Rohan Sharma with S.I. Neetu, P.S. Barakhamba Road.
Ms. Vrinda Bhandari, Ms. Pragya Barsaiyan, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 20.05.2024
AMIT SHARMA, J
MAY 20, 2024 /ab
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 13:04:46
Dhananjay Prahlad Salunke
The State & Anr
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court