Mohd. Ayoub Mir v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi held that the present writ petition became infructuous because the requisite orders had been passed by the competent authority in terms of a previous order dated 08.04.2025. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition and accompanying applications as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The petition and accompanying applications were disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
$~62
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 1376/2024 & CRL.M.A. 26145/2024 & CRL.M.A. 8798/2025
MOHD. AYOUB MIR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarthak Maggon, Advocate
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arjit Sharma, Advocate for State with SI Ravi Dahiya, PS Special Cell Mr. Rushab Aggarwal, Standing Counsel and Mr. Japnish Singh Bhatia, Advocate for R2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 21.05.2025
[ Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
- Learned ASC and learned counsel for petitioner submit that the present petition has become infructuous because in terms with para 2 of order dated 08.04.2025, the requisite orders have been passed by the competent authority and the same have already been challenged by petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MOHD. AYOUB MIR
- respondent
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Coram
Girish Kathpalia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court