Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition; the court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
RAJENDER @ KALLU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Prashant Jain, Advocates.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for State with Insp. Ravi Kumar and SI Rahul Malik, P.S. Maurya Enclave.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 07.11.2024
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
NOVEMBER 7, 2024/ ga
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:49:42
Rajender @ Kallu
State (NCT of Delhi)
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
