Nadir Shah v. State of NCT of Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioners counsel informing that the petitioner had expired and sought leave to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
NADIR SHAH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Khushboo Kohli, Advocate.
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Aniket, Ms. Priya Rai and Mr. Abhishek Tomar, Advocates alongwith SI Sachin Kumar, P.S. Amar Colony.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 06.11.2024
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
NOVEMBER 6, 2024
ga
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:28:44
Nadir Shah
State of NCT of Delhi
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court