Dr Rich Dhamija v. State NCT Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DR RICH DHAMIJA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija Sr. Advocate (Amicus Curiae) (M:9810079901)
versus
STATE NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyam Aggarwal and Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advs. for Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) Mr. M.K. Thakur, Adv. for Mr. Vishal Sood.
Mr. Shivam Sachdeva GP for UOI. Mr. Anupam S Sharrma, Mr. Anurag Andley & Mr. Aditya Andley, Advs. for family members of Dr. Rattan. (M:9654419650)
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
% 02.12.2024
CRL.M.A.36126/2024 (for correction of judgment 08.11.2024) in W.P.(CRL) 2132/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:22:39
to be corrected.
“ 21. ……..
| 4. *** |
A-35, UGF, Shanti Kunj, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi- 110070 * |
Within 25 days of purchase Dr. Rattan relinquished his 50% share in favour of Manisha Pandey @ page 651 of Second Interim Report, Release Deed @ page 858 of Second Interim Report) **** |
Purchased in 2017 in Joint ownership of Dr. Rattan and Manisha Pandey (Dr. Rattan executed registered Release Deed dated 25.08.2017 releasing his 50% share in favour of Manisha Pandey) (Registered Release Deed @ pag3 416 of Tola Kant’s Affidavit) **** **** |
|---|
33. The amount received by Mr. Tola Kant Pandey and his family is to the tune of approximately Rs. 18,20,89,000 /-, even as per the report of the ld. Amicus Curiae. According to Mr. Tola Kant Pandey, the same was gifted to him and his family members by Dr. Rattan. The amount, which has been transferred to Mr. Satish Kumar, is to the tune of approximately Rs.95 lacs , and to Mr. Vishal Sood is to the tune of approximately Rs.16,67,97,627/-.
**** **** **** ****
41. ……. (2) Mr. Lalit Grover, Certified Managerial Accountant ;
…… **** **** **** **** 43. ……..
(xii) Insofar as the Committee is concerned, the fee of the Supervising Guardian- Mr. Akshay Makhija, Senior Advocate is fixed for Rs. 2 lakhs per month and Rs.1 lakh for the Certified Managerial Accountant - Mr. Lalit Grover, Certified Managerial Accountant, which shall be paid from the running accounts of Dr. Rattan. If the Guardianship Committee needs to bear any expenses, the same shall be borne from the accounts
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:22:40
of Dr. Rattan.”
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
AMIT SHARMA, J.
DECEMBER 02, 2024/ dk/am
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:22:40
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr Rich Dhamija
State NCT Delhi
Prathiba M. Singh
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court