Allowed

Arpan Saxena v. the State & Anr.

Delhi HC12 Feb 2024W.P.(CRL)/476/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC seeking expedited passport renewal during pending criminal proceedings. The court allowed withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Trial Court. Trial Court requested to dispose of applications expeditiously.

Arpan Saxena Vs the State & Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~66

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 476/2024 ARPAN SAXENA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.D. Singh & Ms. Divya Tripathi, Advs.

¶4

versus THE STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC with Mr. Ashvini Kumar & Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Advs. SI Naveen, PS- Palam Village Mr. Farman Ali, SPC with Ms. Usha Jamnal & Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advs. for R2

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

¶6

O R D E R % 12.02.2024

¶7

CRL.M.A. 4363/2024 (for exemption)

¶8

Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶9

The application stands disposed of.

¶10

W.P.(CRL) 476/2024

¶11

The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘ CrPC ’), inter alia , seeking directions to Respondent No. 2 to expeditiously process the passport renewal application of the petitioner.

¶12

The learned counsel for the respondent, at the outset, points out that the application for such purpose can be considered in case an appropriate No Objection Certificate is obtained from the concerned Court where the criminal proceedings are pending.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:45:51

¶15

He submits that, in the present case, the proceedings ae pending before the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate-01, South West District, Dwarka Court. He relies upon the Office Memorandum No. VI/401/1/5/2019 dated 10.10.2019.

¶16

In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court and file an appropriate application.

¶17

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶18

As and when any such application is filed, the learned Trial Court is requested to dispose of the same expeditiously.

¶19

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

¶20

FEBRUARY 12, 2024 “SS”

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:45:51

Arpan Saxena v. the State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arpan Saxena v. the State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Mahto Vs State of NCT and Anr. & Anr.

Geeta Nagar Vs the State of NCT Delhi and Ors.

Mehman Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Mohd Tahir & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Rakesh Kumar Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mrs. Moushmi Dey & Anr. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Mrs. Minkal Kaur Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Hansraj Surana Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ravinder and Ors. Vs State Goivt.of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Manish Kumar & Ors. Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) through SHO of Police Station Wazirabad & Anr.

Sumit Rana & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Deepankur Mittal Vs State through SHO Ps Prasad Nagar and Anr.

Avijit Maikap Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Yashpal Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.