The petitioner challenged an order of the Metropolitan Magistrate. The Court held that since the order was revisable under Section 397 CrPC, an efficacious alternate remedy existed. Consequently, the petition under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
YASHPAL SINGH
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Riyaz A., Mr. Saifuddin & Mr. Sikander A. Siddiqui, Advs.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State SI Rakesh Kumar, PSSwarup Nagar
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 12.02.2024
CRL.M.C. 1134/2024 & CRL.M.A. 4446/2024 (for stay)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:38:15
CrPC.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024 “SS”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:38:15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC when an efficacious alternate statutory remedy is available?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
YASHPAL SINGH
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
AMIT MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
