The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition before the Delhi High Court. The bench allowed the withdrawal in para 2, dismissing the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal principle was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
Through: Mr. Lakshay Yadav with Mr. Deepanshu Goswami, Ms. Kirti Chahar & Mr. Rohit Sahrawat, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: SI Gaurav, P.S. EOW.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2024/ hs
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:12:42
Mrs. Minkal Kaur
State of NCT of Delhi
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
