Petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 and Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking protection from accused. State officer agreed to assign a beat officer. Court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
MRS. MOUSHMI DEY & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Hasibuddin, Advocate
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Mr.Priyam Aggarwal, Advocate with SI Sumit Kumar
Mr.Amit Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
b) Direct the Respondent No.1/State to provide adequate protection to the petitioners from the hands of respondent no.3 in the interest of Justice.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:12:46
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2024 na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:12:46
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners can withdraw the writ petition seeking protection and the state will grant leave.
Whether the state has provided adequate protection by assigning a beat officer.
Mrs. Moushmi Dey
Unnamed Petitioner (And Others)
The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Unnamed Respondents (And Others)
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
