This order dismisses the petition by directing the State to decide the petitioner's pending parole application within two weeks, noting no opposition to the prayer.
Direction to the respondent to decide the pending parole application within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
MEHMAN SINGH ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Tanya Agarwal, Adv.
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Kunal Mittal and Ms. Rishika, Advs. for Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R
% 09.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:14:02
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024/dss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:14:02
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent is directed to dispose of the pending parole application within a specific time frame.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mehman Singh
State of NCT of Delhi
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
